Tag Archives: Internet law

Latest Posts

Archives

Categories

Tags Cloud

Website Liability for Encouraging Dangerous Behaviors

Website Liability for Encouraging Dangerous Behaviors
Websites like YouTube pay creators of original content based on the advertising watched by viewers of their videos. Some people make a living solely by creating videos for YouTube; “YouTube celebrities” can earn well over $1 million a year. The potential payoff from large view-counts has encouraged the rise of stunt videos, in which people do dangerous things solely to attract clicks. Last year a woman fatally shot her boyfriend in a stunt they had planned to increase their viewership. Do sites like YouTube bear any legal responsibility for encouraging such behavior?

Assumption of risk limits liability

The short answer is: probably not. One reason is that individuals who knowingly engage in risky behavior typically bear responsibility for any injuries they suffer. A personal injury lawsuit usually requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant was negligent in some way, and the negligence caused the plaintiff’s injury. But if the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury, the defendant will not be held liable. In legal terms, assumption of risk only requires that the plaintiff voluntarily exposed himself or herself to a risk of injury that he or she knew about at the time. This is a fairly low bar that one can see would apply to cases like “stunts” involving guns or other dangerous instruments. It should go without saying that pointing a loaded weapon at yourself is inherently dangerous.

Website terms of service generally disclaim liability

Websites can also rest their defense on a contract theory. Most social media websites require users to agree to some form of user contract that limits the website owner’s liability for the content shown on the site. YouTube’s Terms of Service offers a straightforward example. In paragraph 6(F) YouTube indicates that it doesn’t endorse any user content, and “expressly disclaims any and all liability” for the content on its site. Although in some cases these contracts may be unenforceable, overcoming them can require a rare set of circumstances.

Direct intervention may open the door to liability

Despite their liability waivers, sites will sometimes take steps to remove content that encourages dangerous behavior. YouTube and Facebook have been actively removing videos that encourage people to eat detergent pods, showing that they feel a degree of responsibility to police the content on their sites. Taking steps to address content that encourages viewers to take risk might expose websites to liability for content that escapes removal, on grounds that the sites have acknowledged through their actions that the content is dangerous. Of course, if a website itself creates content or deliberately encourages risky behavior, the scales tilt in favor of liability. For example, if YouTube were to sponsor a contest encouraging people to post videos of their most extreme bike stunts, it would no longer be a passive host. But even in those cases, the user’s assumption of risk would still offer a substantial defense.

GGRM represents injured clients in the Las Vegas area

For over 45 years the law firm of Greenman Goldberg Raby Martinez has represented clients in the Las Vegas area in cases involving personal injury. If you have questions about whether you can sue a website for encouraging dangerous behavior, our attorneys can answer your questions. To speak to an attorney at no cost, please give us a call today at 702-388-4476. We can also be reached through our contacts page.

Website Liability for Online Bullying

Website Liability for Online Bullying
Nevada has adopted a range of laws and regulations designed to prevent cyberbullying. The term covers a wide range of wrongful activities directed at a victim by electronic means (see NRS 388.122 for the complete definition of bullying). The law prohibits cyberbullying in schools and authorizes school authorities to take disciplinary actions against violators. For adults cyberbullying is also a crime, punishable as a misdemeanor or, in more serious cases, a gross misdemeanor. NRS 392.915. Even though cyberbullies are not physically attacking their victims, they can cause real harm. Victims of cyberbullying can end up hurting themselves or needing expensive psychiatric care. In those situations, parents sometimes wonder if the websites that host the forum where cyberbullying occurs can be held legally liable for damages. To encourage the robust development of the Internet, federal law provides blanket protection for websites and other “interactive computer services” against liability for content that they do not create themselves. Under Section 230 of the federal  Communications Decency Act, a provider of website services cannot be treated as a publisher or speaker of any content provided by others. 47 U.S.C. §230(c)(1). This means that the host of an online discussion forum, social media companies like Facebook or Twitter, and owners of chat rooms are all protected from being vicariously liable for the content on their sites. The law preempts state law, meaning that state courts cannot skirt around it to impose liability that would not stick in federal court. Like a lot of legal topics involving new technologies, there are sometimes arguments that attorneys can use to show that Section 230 doesn’t apply to a specific website. Even if the owner’s agent, such as a site moderator, gets involved in a thread in which cyberbullying takes place, the immunity of Section 230 may still apply unless the moderator adds harmful language to the discussion that would itself be a form of cyberbullying. In legal terms, by assuming responsibility for creating harmful content the website ceases to be a “publisher” and becomes an “information content provider.” A website also could lose immunity if it encourages users to cyberbully others. A court has held that a website that “elicits allegedly illegal content and makes aggressive use of it in conducting its business” would not be immune under Section 230. Fair Hous. Council v. Rommates.com, LLC, 521 F.3d 1157, 1172 (2007). The attorneys at Greenman Goldberg Raby Martinez are keeping a close eye on the evolving borders between technology and the law. We have represented personal injury clients in the Las Vegas area for over 45 years and would be happy to talk to you about your cyberbullying case. Call us today for a free attorney consultation at 702-388-4476, or reach us through our contact page.